CU Season Preview
I've posted my season preview over at Buffs.tv. Go Buffs!
All new Maxwell edition
Take a deep breath and then check out Sam, three-time winner of the World's Ugliest Dog contest.
I took this picture at a zoo in Australia. If that's a kickboxing match, the kangaroo is totally going to kick his ass.
Only two and a half weeks left until the CU/CSU game in Boulder! For you CU fans, check out www.buffs.tv where I'm a contributing editor. I should have my annual season prediction column up within the next week (I know you can't wait).
I don't want this to turn into a book report blog, but I've been reading a lot lately and wanted to catch everyone up. Some thoughts:
I finished Freakonomics last week and overall I would rate it a "Hm". By "Hm", I mean that I thought it was interesting enough for a short single-toned "Hm", but not enough for the full-length, dual-toned "Hmmm". While I thought that the ideas were interesting enough, it felt like the authors repeated themselves way too often. The connection between legalized abortion and the crime rate is by far the most interesting part of the book. The rest of the book almost feels like filler to get to an appropriate number of pages. The authors spend some time investigating how much influence parents have on their children's future with the conclusion that almost all of the influence is limited to genetics. They didn't really convince me, as it seems that all of their data and "proof" relies on measures of intelligence. They found that all other things being equal, kids whose parents "over-parent" (i.e. read to them a lot, take them to zoos/museums, etc) are no smarter than those whose parents don't do these things. They then use this study to claim that parents don't really matter. I have a hard time with this as I think it ignores a lot of other aspects of a child's development. I know that they're just claiming that parents don't have much influence with regards to a child's intelligence (except for genetics), but I found the wording to be poor. All in all, a short and enjoyable read, but I didn't find it as interesting and thought-provoking as others have claimed. Now on to two other books, one good for me and the other for enjoyment (see to the right in reverse order).